Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:23

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Your TRICARE Checklist for Moving - TRICARE Newsroom (.mil)
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Netflix’s Buzzy New Doc About an Infamous Tragedy Shows It’s Just the Beginning - Slate Magazine
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Measles 'exposure event' confirmed in Great Falls - KRTV
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Is it recommended to leave a note in a lost wallet asking for it to be returned?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Stunning Images Reveal The Sun's Surface in Unprecedented Detail - ScienceAlert
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How the Brain’s RNA Rings Are Formed - Neuroscience News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.